I'm asking them to come forward because its important for us to know if the poll is a lie or not. We have 15 players, 8 of whom i know to have had roles. Thats more than 50% of players, and if we assume that the wolves dont have roles (which isnt a good assumption admittedly), then it becomes important to know if there really ARE humans without roles. It seems increasingly unlikey that there are.
They should understand that the humans can only win if we have good information. They have good information if they are roleless, and without a role that is ALL they can contribute. Period. They have no other usefulness, so they need to contribute as MUCH as POSSIBLE.
That being said, I'm surprised you view this as a personal attack on you. If i wanted to attack you personally I would have done so immediately from the get go. Instead, I just wanted to verify that you were telling the truth to me. I find it strange the way you reacted. You seem overly defensive, to be honest. Even yesterday when I voted for you on a "feeling" you reacted quite strongly. If you were a roleless human, and thats debatable to be honest for me now, I doubt you would be reacting so strongly. A human has nothing to fear if they are truthful.
I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, and the fact that you cant see this is very surprising to be honest. If there are other players that can corroborate your claim, thats only good for you. I dont see why you dont think thats a good thing for you.
FURTHERMORE, roleless humans are NOT good wolf targets. Why would a wolf want to take out a human they know cant cause them harm during the night? Humans with roles are very much more dangerous, because they are an unknown to wolves. Your logic is not very good here, Cosmos, and I'm very disappointed.