I’m using “Active Texture Management - X86 - Basic”, so that’s the same as you. I also have EVE - High Resolution installed, which ought to take a lot of extra memory! I’m confused as to why my client seems to be taking so much less memory than others 
I think you’re right with RealFuels, all simulation is done client side so if you’ve got the wrong RealFuels config your client will search for fuel for the engines and not find anything. We should all be using the same RF config though!
It’s not an automatic selection, and the first time I installed the modpack, I selected the realistic one, and the next time, stock-alike.
the realistic one messed up the B9 IVAs.
honestly, I’ll be happy if there’s no realfuel next time.
Oh darn, I thought someone above said that the correct version was ticked. I guess I should add a note to the install instructions later.
Next time definitely no RF! It’s very cool as part of the realism overhaul, but once you try to build a more varied modpack it becomes a huge pain in the ass 
The next version of KSP is in test at the moment, so we may see a release in a couple of weeks 
The correct config is specified in the clan file, however it still asks you to choose when it installs real fuels.
Welp, I’ve managed to install my modpack such that my game crashes during the loading screen at the start-up. …I’ll do a clean download and see if i can get it working. This is too much work for video games :c
also: LyskTrevise
Running out of memory? Mine crashes just over 3.8GB.
So am I.
Added.
One thought I had after playing last night (I didn’t test this) was that I’ve been working out by Minmus, wheras you guys are working around Kerbin. There is a lot more stuff around there, maybe that’s impacting memory usage? I really doubt it though because physics distance is 5Km, and you’re not likely to be within 5Km of much of that stuff!
Well with the Agressive ATM and -force-opengl, I load at around 2.8GB, once flying it goes up to 3.4GB, crashing a bit less though, but still can’t exit by clicking the close button.
Also I’ve started fiddling with kOS, got a boot script running on my vessels to open my solar panels and comms once above 100km, no more dead ships. 
There seems to be updates to some mods and KSP 1.0 is inbound next week?
I know that KSP 1.0 is incoming but so far I haven’t seen a solid date, where did you see “next week”?
Once 1.0 rolls around we can rebuild the modpack, this time with no RealFuels! Also I guess we can hold back on the part packs and add them in slowly, that way people can monitor their memory usage and we can stop growing the pack when appropriate.
They moved from QA to experimentals a week ago, some people on their forums are speculating a week or two of that final testing stage…
Found this today! [Official images of stock fairings, with added resource scanner.][1]. Disappointingly inferior to the mod version we’ve playing with.
Also, if we’re going to weigh in on mods for a future build of KSP, here are a few I’ve enjoyed playing with:
Parts packs that I like:
a. Stock-a-like: great stuff. Lots of useful parts and the redesigns look spot-on.
b. KW parts! Their engines fill a bunch of niches, meaning I can better fine-tune my stuff. Also, engine clusters look incredibly badass.
c. Whichever one does the servos. Having a station module I can unfold after the fairing comes off is pretty cool. Motors are something that should absolutely be in stock KSP.
d. Whichever one does the fairings. I like em, they’re great to use.
e. (guilty pleasure) electric engines of some sort. Some are a bit OP (cough VASIMR) , and there are an absurd number of them in our current pack, but having one or two options other than the venerable PB-ION would be nice.
f. Probably something else. There are some parts I’ve already gotten so used to I take them for granted now .
I’m ambivalent to the rest, but some paring down would be nice.
In other news, Camkin Kerman has landed on Pol and has his eyes set on Bop. Mission controllers are doubtful the mission will proceed, however, given fuel consumption data from Camkin’s EVA-powered deorbit, landing, reorbit, and rendezvous. They worry that this combined with Bop’s significantly higher surface gravity may present an unacceptable danger to our hero, especially given that the closest help is years away.
Mission Controllers, unfortunately, are also years away. All eyes are on Camkin. Will he do something shockingly dangerous, like use his Sunfish to attempt to land on Bop? Will he roll the dice and try with the EVA pack? No one knows! [1]: http://imgur.com/IQVp3st,E5QqW6u,gXQpd0D
Now parts are our real concern. We’re going to have to carefully pick and choose our part packs to stay within memory budget.
Regarding electric engines specifically, they’re actually not that OP. I had to modify all of them myself to make them work with RF and I obviously just choose badly.
I wouldn’t be sorry to see Real Fuels bite the dust! As long as we can still mine ore and turn that into stock fuels, I don’t think we’d be missing much.
Started creating on the server today but had a crash to desktop going back to the VAB.
I don’t think I’ll ever play KSP without MechJeb and kOS again, they are not part mods and I think they should be included.
On a different note, GTA V on PC is great, epic great!
Absolutely, MechJeb and kOS will both definitely be in! I haven’t played much with kOS yet, but I have big plans…
Forget kos. It’s the most retarded language I’ve seen.
Look for Selene. It adds Lua - an actual scripting language.
How bad could it be?
And I’m working with PHP and Javascript for my day job; I’m hard to impress.
I know i’ve been pretty absent, schools killin’ me.
Reentry heat is being implemented in 1.0 as fair as I know.
From the little I did play, I only had some issues with RF balance, I don’t mind either way. Whatever is easiest for you martin!
RT and karbonite are essential. Maybe we can try procedural fuel tanks instead of using RF? I’m pretty sure it allows you to choose which fuel is loaded into the tanks, while giving you the option to size them however you want and into fun shapes like spheres, cones, etc.
Many mods will break in 1.0 however, It may take some time for them to update post release.
Is Karbonite essential? Doesn’t 1.0 come with it’s own resource system?
Procedural fuel tanks sounds like a good idea, added that to the suggestions list.
Edit: Are any of you any good at designing planes in KSP? It’s a long time since I last built a plane and I can’t seem to get my landing gear to work correctly on take off, it’s incredibly frustrating! Every time I take off I:
Am I doing something wrong with my launch sequence? If not, what design issues should I check for?
Two things to mention:
1: SAS is very useful during takeoff, if your plane has trouble staying straight.
2: Make sure your landing gear is vertical. if you let it be normal to your fuselage like it is by default, the wheels will try to steer your plane in odd directions if they aren’t all perfectly on the tarmac.